Law Enforcement Railroading
Dominic Clout, Chief Superintendent, Borough Commander, Metropolitan Police (Camden)
Stephen House, Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police
This exposé introduces a sub-section of the series of new articles that
reveal a decade of alleged criminal activity by a proven psychopath
Jeremy Dear, General Secretary, National Union of Journalists
who has obstructed justice for political expedience
by using delay and denial of due process of law,
defamation, harassment, and other unlawful practices.
Introduction
Metropolitan (Camden) and Strathclyde (MC&S) police officers have delayed and denied justice by neglecting to respond to criminal referrals with diligent investigation. They used stonewalling and other aberrant behaviour to evade their duty of care. Moreover, they contemptuously addressed criminal referrals with frivolous and vexatious responses in the way that George Orwell protested and wrote about as an author and journalist. [Strathclyde Police]
Sixty years ago, Orwell predicted aberrant behaviour would occur in totalitarian states. A long-time member of NUJ, who attacked totalitarianism and lobbied for social justice, he died in 1950 three years after the author started his Fleet Street apprenticeship.
[Apologia] [Orwell Biography]
The term "duty of care" has special legal significance when applied to police officers. It describes an obligation imposed by law which applies particularly to them. That obligation forms part of a fiduciary duty owed to the public that they serve. The standard that they maintain must reach at least the level of responsibility that a reasonable citizen must uphold. Police officers must also exercise reasonable care to protect the public interest from harm by others. They must not violate victims’ rights through willful blindness or negligence. In this case, they have willfully denied all allegations in criminal complaints.
[Duty of Care]
MC&S has neglected to properly address criminal referrals which name National Union of Journalist (NUJ) officials and officers. That neglect has encouraged NUJ to file more frivolous and vexatious criminal charges against the referrer and an NUJ officer to threaten grievous bodily harm directly attributed to the referrals.
[A Patent Stitch-up] [Metropolitan (Camden) Referral] [Strathclyde Referral]
Metropolitan Police (Camden) continues to bury the issues in the same way that other police divisions have buried charges of aggravated assault by NUJ associates (that also implicate misconduct by police officers) and an attempted abduction using illegal mobile phone tapping. MC&S officers, through their unwillingness to act, have effectively allowed NUJ, and the international mafia who originally jailed the author, to again put a price on his head. They have allowed psychopaths to gain control of legal proceedings. [The Plod Thickens]
Aggravated assault defines as knowingly and recklessly causing intentional serious bodily harm to another person with indifference to the value of life. The term “grievous bodily harm” means causing serious physical injury by any means. Both those definitions apply to incidents associated with the police referrals.
At least five police divisions, particularly MC&S, have shown a pattern or practice of arbitrary general denial. That ploy, for which police officers throughout the UK have become notorious. obstructs justice by claiming that criminal issues classify as civil, thereby removing the responsibility for them to investigate.
Court rules do not allow arbitrary or general denial (denying all allegations in a referral) without genuinely interpreting the content and associated statutes. MC&S has effectively supported NUJ political expedience by obstructing due process, thereby delaying and denying justice.
National Union of Journalists (NUJ)
MC&S has delayed and denied due process of law by neglecting diligently to investigate charges of defamation, harassment, and other unlawful practices which include aggravated assault and threats of grievous bodily harm. By using general denial, high ranking police officers have neglected to recognize a decade of alleged criminal actions by a proven psychopathic NUJ general secretary and successive NUJ in-house solicitors who have obstructed justice for political expedience. By that, MC&S neglected its duty of care and arbitrarily refused to investigate criminal complaints solely on information received from a rogue lawyer.
![]() |
During the past decade, NUJ solicitors have established a pattern of similar illegal tactics to those used by mafiosi a decade ago to silence the author after he exposed their crimes in the course of his work as a journalist. They have repeatedly denied or manipulated NUJ services and legal representation to members, thereby giving strength to their adversaries.
NUJ suppressed publication of a Washington Supreme Court finding for the journalist by illegal prior restraint. It then denied legal representation to seek reparations for serious damage to health and property which has effectively granted impunity to an international mafia. [Time-Warp Stratagem] [Prior Restraint]
NUJ lawyers have arbitrarily denied access to legal services to various members despite a £250,000.00 dues-funded retainer to an outside law firm to provide those services. NUJ has also withheld documents to frustrate legal process by lawyers independently instructed by members denied legal services. That withholding and denial of service has reached criminal proportions. Some members have not renewed their membership in disgust. [Mincoffs Flying Circus]
As part of an NUJ campaign of derogation and intimidation, NUJ in-house solicitor recently filed trumped-up criminal allegations against the journalist, according to statements by a Metropolitan (Camden) police officer. He released confidential information protected by Data Protection Act (DPA) to that officer in order to harass the journalist. [Derogation]
Those allegations effectively retaliated for filing complaints with MC&S against NUJ and exposed the NUJ member to risk of arrest, imprisonment pending trial, and possible wrongful conviction and sentence. By that, NUJ attempted either to preempt or to evade police investigation of complaints already recorded against them and attempted to pervert the course of justice. [The Plod Thickens]
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) presently has complaints of gross professional misconduct by successive NUJ in-house solicitors under consideration. An update to that complaint will address the latest activity to which MC&S has responded with general denial. The referrer totally rejects the MC&S responses as false, misleading, and a distortion of facts that reflect the true position. MC&S has effectively parroted language presented to them by the NUJ in-house solicitor which follows a distinct pattern of planned deception and disingenuous behaviour to cover up criminal activity during the past decade.
Metropolitan Police (Camden) and Strathclyde Police (MC&S) Divisions
Even a first-year plod should know that fraud, harassment, stalking, computer crime, money laundering, and abuse of elderly people rank as criminal offences. Aggravated assault and threatened grievous bodily harm now figure prominently among other crimes committed by NUJ officials and its associates in attempts to silence the messenger, to destroy the message, and to evade legal process.
Crimes allegedly perpetrated by NUJ officials and officers show a pattern or practice which includes misappropriation of union funds, denial of accounting scrutiny, and bribery. A pattern or practice defines as, and manifests in, two or more organized acts or instances which indicate ensuant activity. To establish a pattern, laws generally require at least two acts within a ten year period which indicate ensuant activity and show a distinctive pattern. [Criminal Neglect]
|
|
Evasion of Duty of Care during Investigation of Criminal Incidents |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Clout |
Wilson |
Cobb |
House |
O'Donnell |
Pollock |
||
|
The arrogance and insolence of police officers shows a lack of responsibility and respect for members of the public who pay their salaries and to whom they have a duty of care. Convening a public inquiry into the issues reported on this web site has become essential to the public good. [Public Inquiry] Reasonable people must ask: Do Metropolitan (Camden) and Strathclyde police officers need a corpse before they investigate NUJ threats of grievous bodily harm and process police incident reports of aggravated assault? [Aggravated Assault] Metropolitan (Camden) and Strathclyde police divisions (MC&S) have delayed and denied justice by neglecting to respond to criminal referrals with diligent investigation. They have used stonewalling and Orwellian tactics to evade their duty of care and denied full investigation of criminal incidents with frivolous and vexatious responses. [Strathclyde Police - Railroading] Officers at the highest level have responded with arrogance and dumb insolence. They have begged questions and avoided issues using assumptions and general denial when the law requires manifest conclusions. Metropolitan Police (Camden): Dominic Clout, Chief Superintendent, Borough Commander; Neil Wilson, Detective Superintendent and David Cobb, Detective Chief Inspector. Strathclyde Police: Stephen House, Chief Constable; Anthony O'Donnell, Chief Inspector, Glasgow Central and West Division and John Pollock, Chief Superintendent, Professional Standards Department. |
|||||||
A mafia filed false and misleading criminal charges with Washington Superior Court (2000) against an NUJ journalist which resulted in him languishing in jail for 111 days (with 25 days in solitary confinement) where guards tortured him. At the age of 70 he served an indeterminate sentence and experienced several near-death experiences before release on a writ similar to habeas corpus. Nine judges in Washington Supreme Court unanimously absolved him of any wrongdoing (30 Mar 06). NUJ and UK embassy officials did nothing to secure his release although constantly aware of the circumstances. [Washington Supreme Court]
Prior to the World Trade Center disaster (09 Nov 01), mafiosi entered into evidence an article as proof of harassment by the journalist. That article reported Islamic terrorist activity in a Jewish multistoried apartment complex in Seattle. The mafia ignored the fact that FBI and the building administrator had second thoughts and fired the extremist security guard (ironically, they allowed him to keep the building master keys).
[Tall Structure Terror]
The mafia had the journalist jailed despite his public service in warning FBI about a terrorist cell: a report that fulfilled his journalism duty of care to hold innocent people harmless. Two years after publication of the original report, both Seattle Times and Seattle Post-Intelligencer validated the content. They reported that FBI had arrested the same people in a terrorist training camp in Oregon.
Mafiosi also objected to the journalist writing articles that exposed crimes and abuse which caused the death of at least three elderly people, one of them a Holocaust survivor, and aggravated assault upon a 65-year old woman confined in a wheel chair with a heart condition. The journalist had previously warned them that if they did not revamp the building security a fatality could occur.
[Who Killed Jackie Nations?] [Last Cruel Days. Homicide?] [Whitewash] [Witness Tampering] [The Mullen Legacy]
Washington Supreme Court reversed all the lower court decisions; however, NUJ has since discriminated against the member by providing legal and member support on a regular basis to other members in similar circumstances. Concurrent with acting for those members, NUJ derogated the journalist and denied him member services. They attempted to silence him to try to cover up their own neglect in condoning his jailing. They then took part in a conspiracy with Labour government ministers to cover up dereliction by UK consular services.
|
A Collusive, Coercive, Disingenuous Quintet |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Public Inquiry Convening a public inquiry into the issues reported on this web site has become essential to the public good. |
||
|
Straw |
Ricketts |
Sheinwald |
Miliband |
Thomas |
|||
|
David Miliband MP, Former Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Sir Peter Ricketts, Permanent Under-Secretary and Head of the Diplomatic Service; Sir Nigel Sheinwald, British Ambassador to the United States; Jack Straw MP, former Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor; and Gareth Thomas MP, Former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for International Development colluded in a cover-up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office dereliction with Jeremy Dear, General Secretary, National Union of Journalists. |
|||||||
Neglect by NUJ and HM government to act has effectively granted impunity to a Seattle mafia which lost the Washington Supreme Court case. Since that finding (30 Mar 06), mafiosi have virtually locked the administrator in his office. He filed more than sixty instances of perjured or suborned testimony which sent the journalist to jail and solitary confinement. According to sources, mafiosi (who also filed perjured testimony) have continued to employ the administrator for four years in a mutual blackmail. They use grant and government money to pay the administrator to bury crimes that they mutually committed.
The administrator now spends his time in isolation trying to obtain more grants which the directors use for illegal commercial ventures. After the supreme court finding, the mafia removed him from contact with elderly tenants whom he constantly abused. Three of them died as a result of that abuse. Since his isolation, no tenants have died by homicide, suffered grievous bodily harm, or suffered unlawful eviction or incarceration for looking at him cross-eyed.
In Washington state, perjury by signing false or misleading declarations classifies as a class B felony. That offense carries a maximum punishment of ten years in a correctional institution, and/or a $20,000 fine, on each count. Jailing someone under false pretenses using perjury and subornation for that purpose classifies as a grievous crime punishable by a long prison sentence. Homicide by abuse ranks as a class A felony punishable by a maximum sentence of life imprisonment in a state correctional institution or by a fine of fifty thousand dollars or both.
The mafia and their administrator deliberately used multiple instances of perjury and subornation as a political weapon to silence a journalist. By that reckoning, the administrator and some members of the mafia (who are also members of Washington State Bar Association) should upon conviction serve sixty 10-year sentences for perjury or subornation and three life sentences for homicide by abuse. However, through NUJ neglect and recent MC&S collusion they remain free and the journalist continues to suffer the result of the mutual neglect.
[Perjury and Subornation] [Homicide by Abuse]
MC&S has neither processed the referrals nor substantiated their frivolous responses; instead, they effectively denied an investigation. They have neither presented a legal argument to support their contentions nor cited a legal precedent that permits a general denial. Moreover, they have not petitioned a court to allow them to use general denial; instead, they have acted arbitrarily. [Strathclyde Police]
Police officers in another division forced entry into the referrer’s home then held him hostage and interrogated him for two hours without a search warrant. They removed documents and made outrageous claims during interrogation now subject to investigation by professional standards police officers. [WIP - sub judice]
Responses to reasoned, peer-reviewed referrals have met with categoric statements without substantiation which insult the referrer’s intelligence. The referrer has fifty years experience as a journalist during which time he read law. He has spent three decades investigating both academic corruption and abuse of elderly people, yet MC&S referred him to Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) in an attempt to evade their responsibility to investigate the issues.
MC&S have started a merry-go-round on issues that arose a decade ago. They have deliberately ignored information in the public domain (which includes more than 900 media articles published from Moscow to Madrid) by not investigating a stitch-up orchestrated by NUJ officials to cover up their alleged crimes which predicate upon a government payoff and neglect by NUJ of its duty of care. [A Patent Stitch-up]
In a distinct conflict of interest, NUJ negotiated a £262,000.00 quid pro quo with Labour government ministers. By that, NUJ officials not only left a member to languish in jail but also three years later accepted a payoff to cover up Labour government dereliction. The payoff effectively allowed HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) to cover up dereliction by its embassy which condoned the jailing in a foreign country without benefit of legal counsel or consular representation. [Quid Pro Quo]
That dereliction violated Human Rights Act 1998, Vienna Convention, and European human and civil rights. NUJ officials have denied the referrer due process of law for almost a decade and have spent nine years covering up their alleged crimes using unlawful prior restraint to cause a media blackout (which included BBC) of the alleged government payoff. [Without Let or Hindrance]
MC&S has recommended seeking redress using NUJ conventions when the complaint predicates upon fraudulent use of those same conventions. That clearly demonstrated another attempt to create a merry-go-round and evade responsibility to address the issues. The many criminal aspects of the complaints against NUJ could easily classify as organised crime and, in that case, warrant investigation by Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA).
The referral will now form part of complaints to Independent Police Complaints Commission (UK) and Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (Scotland) for dereliction of established police duty of care and obstruction of justice.
General Denial
Metropolitan Police (Camden) and Strathclyde Police (MC&S) have not fairly addressed the substance of the facts. If they intend to deny any part of a referral or need qualification of facts, then they must ask for substantiation after identifying the parts that they consider true and material. Instead, they arbitrarily denied everything using a general denial and derogation techniques.
By that, they tried to cover up dereliction, bias, and misconduct. They also ignored the readiness of the referrer to verify allegations under an oath. They used their own interpretation and construction which ignored content that clearly met all legal requirements.
Police officers must maintain a high-level duty of care which means that they must not commit any act that could harm victims of crimes. If they do not satisfactorily meet that standard, then they have a legal obligation to consider those adversely affected by acts or omissions and to make reparation.
MC&S has repeatedly contravened court rules which only permit general denial when the respondent intends in good faith to controvert all assertions of fact. Rarely do general denials pass that test neither do reputable judges admit them into evidence.
Detectives have not interviewed the referrer about the content of the referrals or sent interrogatories to ascertain the true situation and have effectively railroaded him by denying investigation of criminal conduct. They have used railroading techniques which force rapid investigation or litigation to prevent careful consideration and criticism or have denied due process of law. Railroading usually employs dragooning, subjugation, persecution, coercion, or threats and certainly does not constitute ethical police behaviour.
MC&S used ambiguous language to evade resolving a specific issue which arguably defines as obstruction of justice. Their response indicates that they had no intent to process the complaint in the first place. Their delaying tactics can only interpret as political expedience given the involvement of three former Labour ministers, arguably accessories after the fact to international crimes, who form an integral part of the issues upon which the referrals premised.
General denial has no place in the adjudication process. Police officers must substantiate their reasons for refusal or delay by citing precedents and provide the name of a person, address, and statute under which the referrer can appeal their decision. Moreover, MC&S delays in providing a reasoned response have allowed NUJ to file frivolous and vexatious criminal complaints against the referrer. Instead of taking action to mitigate damage, police officers have obstructed and delayed justice then denied it contrary to law.
MC&S has not provided a copy of an NUJ response to the referrals for comment and refutation or provided a legal argument citing precedents, with particularity, that permit the withholding of such a response. They have evidently not challenged the offenders about withholding critical information or cited a precedent that permitted that withholding. MC&S has arbitrarily adopted a narrow construction of law when responses to referrals generally require liberal construction, at least until a judge decides otherwise.
Anarchy
|
Justice relies upon principles and procedures founded in law and precedent otherwise a state of anarchy exists which has no place in a democracy. Member apathy and anarchy has resulted in an extreme left, splinter group (NUJ-Left). Orchestrated by a dangerously psychopathic (sociopathic) general secretary and a rogue lawyer, out-of-control NUJ officials and officers with a total disregard for rules, law, and mandated procedures prevent any resolution of legitimate complaints.
A political theory, anarchy holds all forms of authority unnecessary and undesirable. It advocates a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups despite rules and laws to the contrary. It destroys democracy in favor of special interest splinter groups or cabals.
Anarchy results from failure of an organization to control lawlessness and disorder. It manifests in an absence of political authority and cohesive principles that predicate upon a common standard or purpose. NUJ has descended to that level.
David Broom, the former UK consul, took advantage of mafia anarchy in Seattle to manipulate the political and judicial system for commercial purposes to the detriment of a British subject whom he had sworn to assist and protect. Similar anarchy already exists in NUJ. The recent irresponsible behavior by MC&S and other police divisions points to that condition existing in UK law enforcement.
Conclusion
MC&S officers at the highest level have responded with arrogance and dumb insolence. They have begged questions and avoided issues using assumptions and general denial when the law requires manifest conclusions.
MC&S has neglected to process criminal complaints by employing railroading techniques. Railroading consists of dragooning, subjugation, persecution, coercion, or threats and certainly does not constitute ethical police behaviour. Those unlawful ploys have forced rapid investigation to prevent careful consideration and criticism of the issues. By that, MC&S has started a merry-go-round effectively to deny due process of law.
The referrals will now form part of complaints to Independent Police Complaints Commission (UK) and Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (Scotland) for dereliction of established police duty of care and obstruction of justice. Perhaps that will force MC&S to address the issues and clean up their act. They must properly investigate the criminal referrals which could involve at least five police divisions in a public inquiry now under consideration by members of UK and EU governments.
nota bene (24 Aug 10)
The editor sent a prepublication notice and excerpt of content to Chief Inspector Anthony O'Donnell, Strathclyde Police, Glasgow Central and West Division (03 Aug 10) with a copy to his superior officer Chief Constable Stephen House. The notice informed them that a new article published that day to a restricted readership with a general release deadline (13 Aug 10) responded to O’Donnell’s letter (14 Jul 10 received 27 Jul 10). Neither O’Donnell nor House responded before the deadline. [Strathclyde Police - Railroading]
The prepublication notice provided them with a further opportunity to refute assertions in the article with facts substantiated by legal citations. O’Donnell had created a legally inadmissable general denial in response to a criminal referral. Court rules do not allow arbitrary or general denials (denying all allegations in a complaint).
O’Donnell effectively conformed to NUJ political expedience by obstructing due process, thereby delaying and denying justice. He did not process the referral or substantiate his claims; instead, he effectively denied an investigation.
A final notice sent to House (17 Aug 10) with a copy to O'Donnell reminded them that they had neglected to substantiate O'Donnell's frivolous and vexatious response to a criminal referral. That referral named National Union of Journalist officials and officers.
The final notice informed House that the issues would receive international media attention and review concurrent with a decision to file a complaint with Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service claiming dereliction of duty of care and neglect to address a criminal referral with due diligence in accordance with law.
Inspector Kenny MacDonald, Chief Constable's Secretariat, Strathclyde Police responded by letter (18 Aug 10 received 24 Aug 10):
I write on behalf of Chief Constable Stephen House, in response to your email which was received on the 17 August 2010. I have forwarded your letter to our Professional Standards Department who will ensure that you are contacted in due course regarding the above matter. I trust this will be of assistance meantime.
Strathclyde Police, Professional Standards department has neither confirmed McDonald’s assertion nor contacted the author (10 Sep 10).
This article contains updated information published (23 Aug 10) to a restricted readership before release to international media in the absence of a substantive response to previous correspondence by House or O’Donnell before the publication deadline. This nota bene acknowledges receipt of the letter from MacDonald which contains virtually no information and could construe as yet another unlawful delaying tactic.
Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (Scotland), or a public inquiry, must independently address the alleged police dereliction and machination, not another department of Strathclyde Police. Strathclyde Professional Standards department co-ordinates the investigation of complaints about that force and members of that force. It acts on behalf of, and reports directly to, Strathclyde Deputy Chief Constable who has overall responsibility for disciplinary matters within the force and ultimately reports to Chief Constable Stephen House.
Not only must justice be done; it must also be seen to be done. Investigation of complex issues that involve several police divisions by one of those divisions engenders biased investigation. Use of Strathclyde Professional Standards department creates a distinct conflict of interest by effectively making House his own prosecutor, judge, and jury.
[Nmesis]
See Portable Document File (PDF) for citations and definitions.
|
NUJ/LFB Member Paul Trummel has written hundreds of articles on corporate, union, senior and academic abuse, and institutionalized racism. He founded Contra Cabal (one of the first electronic magazines to appear on the web) for which he develops the site, writes articles, designs pages, and produces graphics. Published in print since 1944 and on the web since 1992, without a single challenge to the authenticity of his reporting, he has spent sixty years as a trade union member and elected delegate, twenty years as a new media industry CEO and systems designer/consultant, and thirty years as a post-graduate professor teaching computer industry executives and students of journalism, law, and graphic design working on masters or doctoral degrees. He has attended or chaired hundreds of faculty and trade union committee meetings including national conventions. The web sites contain articles and descriptions of unlawful prior restraints and abrogation of journalism rights also details of imprisonment and ongoing Internet harassment using denial-of-service attacks. Probably one of the first sites of its type to appear on the web, Contra Cabal has published since 1992. Club JournoScam - Academic Corruption - Elder Abuse - Archives - Contra Cabal Foundation Ltd. Articles cover criminal activity by bureaucrats, union officials, and abusers of elderly people. They describe the actions of corrupt judges and gross misconduct by lawyers who file frivolous law suits against tenants in government financially-assisted housing. They reveal how people in authority use retaliatory measures and propaganda to destroy the reputations of people who report illegal activity and racism. Details of academic credentials and professional qualifications counter record falsification, withholding, and destruction, also forgery by registrars at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and University of Washington. Some articles challenge libel/slander maliciously circulated as part of an international campaign of character assassination, personal vilification, subornation, and perjury to effect prior restraint. Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary recently joined in that defamation. He muckraked to find and extract libelous statements and used them out of context. That suited his purpose to defame the author and to cover-up his eight-year neglect to support him on issues that affect all journalists. NUJ media blackouts cover up his dereliction. Roy Martin Mincoff (NUJ in-house solicitor) negotiated a £262,000.00 quid pro quo between NUJ and the author's member of parliament, Gareth R Thomas MP (Harrow West), Minister of State, Department for International Development in a distinct conflict of interest. Both Mincoff and his predecessor Claire S Kirby (Thompsons Solicitors, Cardiff) are under investigation by Regulation Authority for professional misconduct. Criminal complaints are pending against NUJ officials and NEC officers for fraud and neglect to provide member services. The author's professional and academic credentials and curriculum vitae (about fifty pages) can be accessed from the menus at the top of each page. Anyone with an ethical reason can ask for verification and validation of any of the claims made on those pages. [Curriculum Vitae - Introduction] [Academic Qualifications] Paul Trummel PhD (RPI ABD), PhD (UW ABD), MS (RPI), MSc (UK), BSc (UK) Associate Professor, Communication and Rhetoric (Retired)
UK/EU law firms with US associates or Washington State law firms with UK/EU associates interested in acting for Contra Cabal Foundation Limited in several tort actions against organizations described on Contra Cabal web pages should contact: Paul Trummel Paul Trummel <trummel@contracabal.eu>
|
|
|
Paul Trummel, Professor Emeritus Web Sites: Club JournoScam - Academic Corruption - Elder Abuse - Archives
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2010 by Paul Trummel |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
International Federation of Journalists
The author and publisher has restricted content of this series of articles to National Union of Journalists (NUJ) and International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) members (also named parties, police officers and solicitors who colluded with them) pending investigation of alleged criminal activity and legal action under: Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; Fraud Act 2006; Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006; Equality Act 2010; Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The author reported police officers for dereliction of their duty in accordance with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) guide for handling complaints pursuant to Section 22 Police Reform Act 2002. Complaints against solicitors for professional misconduct referenced: Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007; Solicitors Act 1974; Administration of Justice Act 1985 and Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. Law enforcement investigations involve an alleged pattern or practice of joint and several illegal or criminal activities by: National Union of Journalists (NUJ) executives, lawyers, and staff; National Executive Council (NEC) officers; and London Freelance Branch (LFB) officers. Other branches and chapels do not form part of intended civil and criminal complaints; therefore, the author has no opinion on their activities. Adverse comments, all verified and validated to insure accurate reporting, meet legal requirements. This proviso in no way restricts NUJ and IFJ members from releasing excerpts (with accreditation) to interested third parties including news media.
All individuals featured in Contra Cabal received prior notice in accordance with international codes of ethics agreed among journalists. They had an opportunity to mitigate damage and to refute statements that could negatively affect their reputations or cause investigation or prosecution of them for alleged illegal acts. Several of those codes have international legal precedent. The notices gave them an opportunity to challenge with substantiated evidence any charges affecting their ethical or moral character. For public accountability, the author encouraged them to respond in open exchange before a deadline. Individuals mentioned incidentally received a copy of the notice as a courtesy. Journalists must report the truth no matter whom they offend and with disregard for the consequences of publication. Accurate reporting predicates a higher purpose and the common good. The author did not solicit personal opinions and informed individuals that they should address only matters of fact. The notices declared personal or conflicting interests that related to topics or to opinion especially when the content drew upon advocacy, experience, conclusion, or interpretation. They advised of a responsibility to gather information and develop public awareness about wrongdoing and violation of codes of conduct. Primarily, the articles expose malfeasance and misuse of public funds also abuse of members by trade union officials and officers and law enforcement agencies. Named individuals neglected to adhere to their duty of care. Some maliciously damaged others and their reputations by libel, slander, assault, or other unlawful acts. No person received immunity from investigation. Anything published results from investigation, verification and validation which took into account violations of law or breach of established rules and ethical practices.
|
|
Jeremy Dear Jeremy Dear, the sociopathic NUJ General Secretary who promotes diabolical Marxist ideologies, does not personally suffer the havoc that he wreaks upon members. [Sociopath] [Patent Stitch-up] During NUJ fiscal year 2009: 2008 £73,990.00/pa 2009 £78,349.00/pa A raise of £4,359.00 (5.56%)
During the same period: Dear denied members service for which they paid dues; cancelled an international press card arbitrarily; refused access to documents that prove misappropriation of funds; prevented access to the member section of NUJ web site; denied legal representation; harassed elderly members; prohibited access to Southport ADM without cause; and, promoted a Marxist splinter group using NUJ resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
National Union of Journalists NUJ Cabal (clique) consists of an exclusive group of officials and officers who usurp power for political expedience in violation of Trade Union Jeremy Dear Michelle Stanistreet John Toner Paul Holleran Barry Fitzpatrick Christine L Buckley Claire S Kirby Roy M Mincoff Bernard Roche Peter Murray James Doherty Philip Sutcliffe David Miliband MP, Sir Peter Ricketts, Sir Nigel Sheinwald, Jack Straw MP, Gareth Thomas MP, currently collude in a cover-up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dereliction. [Without Let or Hindrance]
|
|
Letter to the Editor Concerned. Name withheld. It looks to me like a series of internal institutional corruptions where the victim ends up in solitary confinement without a trial and with his life at risk. When a child errs, he/she is usually instructed by the parent responsible for the child’s emotional and spiritual well-being, as well as the basic health of the community as a whole, to "admit and make restitution". What does an institution do when it errs? In these cases each has instituted a series of cover-ups and it appears the only way any of the people involved believe they can extricate themselves is to hope that the victim dies, try to kill him overtly, apply continued pressure, or act illegally to wipe him out of existence. These are not healthy institutions. It is incredible that the characters in this play consist of two presidents of universities, a falsely qualified dean of a university graduate program, directors of apartments for independent living, a phony UK consul general, and officials of a national union of journalists who are supposed to be public gatekeepers, yet all evidence points in that direction. None of these institutions follow the advice given even by a responsible parent to a child. By any means, each institution has felt it necessary to exchange one man's life and reputation in order to cover up it's own institutional failure. Not only that, but as time goes on and harassment continues, each has increasingly involved more and more innocent people in their machinations, thus producing more victims. Obviously, in the minds of these administrators, the institution takes precedence, no matter who dies, who goes to jail, or who becomes innocently and illegally involved. It is an appalling scenario for vulnerable citizens who depend upon the ethical behavior and honesty of their institutions - the elderly for security of person as in the independent living scenario, or in the instance of the universities, the students for faith in honesty for the tuition they pay, the governments for security of persons for whom they are accountable, or for the journalist unions for preserving the integrity of the fourth estate. These are institutions who have behaved irresponsibly, yet they are responsible for hundreds of people temporarily under their care. They are institutions that have been corrupted and in need of reform. Inasmuch as they refuse to reform themselves, for the sake of the people they serve, it seems that a combination of exposure and legal action in a real court of justice or an independent public inquiry, complete with a real investigation, is the only recourse.
|
||||||||||
|
|
Michelle Stanistreet Jeremy Dear's sycophants parrot his politically expedient theories to the detriment of the public good. Enter, Little Miss Muppet, a sleazy slag-off who repeatedly derogates a long-standing NUJ/IFJ member when he writes for the public good. Stanistreet has maliciously disseminated libel to officials and members of the international trade union movement. Slagging alone provides grounds for her impeachment. NUJ has descended to a level of lawlessness and disorder and uses a degenerate shyster unlawfully to enforce its will.
Anarchy and apathy have resulted in an out-of-control, extreme left cabal of executive officers with a total disregard for rules and law. Current practices allow subliterate people to occupy important positions then impose an extreme left dogma to the detriment of a majority of members. [Patent Stitch-up]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Nothing Succeeds Freedom of speech, an absolute right not an abstract philosophy, should not subserve economic considerations. Moreover, information technology remains a right not a privilege despite technocratic claims to the contrary. Legislative and judicial decisions have determined the right of individuals to distribute information freely. Laws do not provide much protection when despotic administrators interfere with computer resources because they disagree with the content of messages: a disagreement probably based upon disclosure of their own malfeasance. They fear dissent and have an aversion to controversy. Their addiction to political correctness frequently causes them to invoke censorship of Internet activities. They not only empower their systems administrators to handle frivolous email complaints by arbitrarily removing computer access but also allow them to censor incoming mail - an outrageous invasion of personal privacy. They act upon an irrational expectation that certain categories of email may contain something that they would not wish others to read then arbitrarily reject it. Interference with email transmission not specifically proscribed by international law classifies as a serious offense which National Union of Journalists officials should note.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Fraudulent Denial of Judge James A Doerty, Washington Superior Court (Seattle) claimed that interviews by journalists with willing sources defined as harassment and that news gathering constituted illegal surveillance and stalking then jailed Paul Trummel "the Journalist" (approaching seventy years of age) without trial or legal counsel contrary to international law. The London-born, grammar school student, Fleet Street indentured apprentice, military veteran, university professor, and National Union of Journalists member, could not comply with an ambiguous and illegal catch-22 that Doerty used to place a prior restraint on free speech. Doerty ordered removal of EU hosted web sites that exposed homicide and elder abuse by his Zionist keepers. With full knowledge of the imminent jailing, Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary and Claire S Kirby (then NUJ in-house solicitor) neglected to act under Vienna Convention and other international laws. They delayed then denied solidarity and support guaranteed by Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Timothy R Gopsill, Editor, Journalist (NUJ magazine) orchestrated a seven-year, media blackout to cover up the neglect by Dear and Kirby which prevented NUJ members from knowing about the case and providing their support. Gopsill also invoked an illegal prior restraint with British Broadcasting Corporation and Press Gazette to insure that they followed suit. David C Broom, British Consul (Seattle) colluded with Doerty to ratchet up coercion which allowed Doerty to transfer the Journalist to incommunicado solitary confinement among murderers and rapists. The Journalist languished in jail for 111 days of an indeterminate sentence and experienced several near-death experiences before release on a writ similar to habeas corpus. Five international media and civil rights amicus curiae argued the case in Washington Supreme Court. In a unanimous finding by nine judges, supreme court reversed all Doerty's decisions which absolved the Journalist of wrongdoing. Dear and Roy Martin Mincoff (present NUJ in-house solicitor), while feigning solidarity, actually colluded in a cover up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dereliction by negotiating a The Law Society, Legal Complaints Service (LCS) has found probable cause that Kirby and Mincoff committed professional misconduct and initiated action by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Meanwhile, Mincoff abused LCS resolution processes by providing false and misleading information.
|
||||||||||
|
|