Michelle Stanistreet, NUJ Deputy General Secretary (who compromises by slagging off) hides behind Paul Holleran, NUJ Scottish Organiser as he cries: "Please spare me from dealing with this [Insert a suitable expletive]".

Jeremy Dear
NUJ General Secretary

Jeremy Dear, the sociopathic NUJ General Secretary who promotes diabolical Marxist ideologies, does not personally suffer the havoc that he wreaks upon members. [Sociopath] [Patent Stitch-up]

During NUJ fiscal year 2009:
a time of recession and unemployment with reduced NUJ membership; a £4 million asset loss; and, a decision to increase member dues; Dear received a 6% salary/benefits increase plus travel expenses and subsistence.

2008 £73,990.00/pa

2009 £78,349.00/pa

A raise of £4,359.00 (5.56%)

[NUJ Annual Returns]

During the same period:

Dear denied members service for which they paid dues; cancelled an international press card arbitrarily; refused access to documents that prove misappropriation of funds; prevented access to the member section of NUJ web site; denied legal representation; harassed elderly members; prohibited access to Southport ADM without cause; and, promoted a Marxist splinter group using NUJ resources.

National Union of Journalists

NUJ Cabal (clique) consists of an exclusive group of officials and officers who usurp power for political expedience in violation of Trade Union
and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

Participants

Jeremy Dear
General Secretary

Michelle Stanistreet
Deputy General Secretary

John Toner
UK Freelance Organiser

Paul Holleran
Scottish Organiser

Barry Fitzpatrick
NUJ Head of Publishing

Christine L Buckley
Editor, Journalist Magazine

Claire S Kirby
(former In-house Solicitor now at Thompsons Solicitors)

Roy M Mincoff
In-house Solicitor

Bernard Roche
Finance Manager

Peter Murray
President and NEC Chairperson

James Doherty
NUJ/NEC member

Philip Sutcliffe
NUJ/NEC member

Accessories after the Fact

David Miliband MP,
Former Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs;

Sir Peter Ricketts,
Permanent Under-Secretary and Head of the Diplomatic Service;

Sir Nigel Sheinwald,
British Ambassador to the United States;

Jack Straw MP,
Former Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor;

Gareth Thomas MP,
Former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for International Development;

currently collude in a cover-up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dereliction.

[Without Let or Hindrance]

Alleged: NUJ Cabal participants have jointly and severally denied due process of law to members and obstructed justice.

Letters to the Editor

Letters should not exceed 250 words, with preference given to those letters responding to articles published in Contra Cabal.

Letters must include the author's name, city, and state, email address, and a phone number for contact and verification.

The Editor reserves the right to edit letters for length and clarity and not to publish all letters.

By submission of a letter, the author agrees that Contra Cabal may publish and/or license the publication of letters in print, electronically, and for archival purposes.

Michelle Stanistreet
Deputy General Secretary

Jeremy Dear's sycophants parrot his politically expedient theories to the detriment of the public good.

Enter, Little Miss Muppet, a sleazy slag-off who repeatedly derogates a long-standing NUJ/IFJ member when he writes for the public good.

Stanistreet has maliciously disseminated libel to officials and members of the international trade union movement. Slagging alone provides grounds for her impeachment.

NUJ has descended to a level of lawlessness and disorder and uses a degenerate shyster unlawfully to enforce its will.

Anarchy and apathy have resulted in an out-of-control, extreme left cabal of executive officers with a total disregard for rules and law.

Current practices allow subliterate people to occupy important positions then impose an extreme left dogma to the detriment of a majority of members. [Patent Stitch-up]

Nothing Succeeds
like Excess

Freedom of speech, an absolute right not an abstract philosophy, should not subserve economic considerations.

Moreover, information technology remains a right not a privilege despite technocratic claims to the contrary.

Legislative and judicial decisions have determined the right of individuals to distribute information freely.

Laws do not provide much protection when despotic administrators interfere with computer resources because they disagree with the content of messages: a disagreement probably based upon disclosure of their own malfeasance.

They fear dissent and have an aversion to controversy. Their addiction to political correctness frequently causes them to invoke censorship of Internet activities.

They not only empower their systems administrators to handle frivolous email complaints by arbitrarily removing computer access but also allow them to censor incoming mail - an outrageous invasion of personal privacy.

They act upon an irrational expectation that certain categories of email may contain something that they would not wish others to read then arbitrarily reject it.

Interference with email transmission not specifically proscribed by international law classifies as a serious offense which National Union of Journalists officials should note.

National Union of Journalists

International Federation of Journalists

Distribution Proviso

The author and publisher has restricted content of this series of articles to National Union of Journalists (NUJ) and International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) members (also named parties, police officers and solicitors who colluded with them) pending investigation of alleged criminal activity and legal action under: Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; Fraud Act 2006; Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006; Equality Act 2010; Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The author reported police officers for dereliction of their duty in accordance with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) guide for handling complaints pursuant to Section 22 Police Reform Act 2002. Complaints against solicitors for professional misconduct referenced: Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007; Solicitors Act 1974; Administration of Justice Act 1985 and Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

Law enforcement investigations involve an alleged pattern or practice of joint and several illegal or criminal activities by: National Union of Journalists (NUJ) executives, lawyers, and staff; National Executive Council (NEC) officers; and London Freelance Branch (LFB) officers.

Other branches and chapels do not form part of intended civil and criminal complaints; therefore, the author has no opinion on their activities. Adverse comments, all verified and validated to insure accurate reporting, meet legal requirements. This proviso in no way restricts NUJ and IFJ members from releasing excerpts (with accreditation) to interested third parties including news media.

Prepublication Information

All individuals featured in Contra Cabal received prior notice in accordance with international codes of ethics agreed among journalists. They had an opportunity to mitigate damage and to refute statements that could negatively affect their reputations or cause investigation or prosecution of them for alleged illegal acts. Several of those codes have international legal precedent.

The notices gave them an opportunity to challenge with substantiated evidence any charges affecting their ethical or moral character. For public accountability, the author encouraged them to respond in open exchange before a deadline. Individuals mentioned incidentally received a copy of the notice as a courtesy.

Journalists must report the truth no matter whom they offend and with disregard for the consequences of publication. Accurate reporting predicates a higher purpose and the common good. The author did not solicit personal opinions and informed individuals that they should address only matters of fact.

The notices declared personal or conflicting interests that related to topics or to opinion especially when the content drew upon advocacy, experience, conclusion, or interpretation. They advised of a responsibility to gather information and develop public awareness about wrongdoing and violation of codes of conduct. Primarily, the articles expose malfeasance and misuse of public funds also abuse of members by trade union officials and officers and law enforcement agencies.

Named individuals neglected to adhere to their duty of care. Some maliciously damaged others and their reputations by libel, slander, assault, or other unlawful acts. No person received immunity from investigation. Anything published results from investigation, verification and validation which took into account violations of law or breach of established rules and ethical practices.