© Copyright by Paul Trummel 1992-2012. All rights reserved.

Updated 19 January 2012 16:04

From each according to their inabilities, to each according to their greed.

The Grim Reapers - Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Chester & District Housing Trust, John Denny, Chief Executive

John Denny A new series of articles exposes criminal neglect and informs the public so that they may recognize a serious situation that could cause them permanent impairment or death by carbon monoxide poisoning. The Trust has neglected its duty of care to correct dangerous emissions in flats which they have a legal responsibility to maintain in a safe condition. By that, it knowingly exposed elderly tenants and families to a variety of health and safety risks. Trust executives then harassed and bullied tenants when they complained to government regulators about violation of laws and denial of human rights. [Introduction] Executives of Chester & District Housing Trust Limited “the Trust”, a public sector company; PH Jones (Trust Contractor for Gas Maintenance and Certification); and Ann Edwina Hall (the Landlord), a private landlord who received taxpayer-funded rents; have allegedly neglected properly to maintain gas appliances and flues in the condition required by law. By that, the Trust violated: Gas Safety Regulations 1998, #2451, Health and Safety; Equality Act 2010; Human Rights Act 1998 and other statutes in pari materia. The Trust must now comply with revised laws (01 Jan 12) which provide for extra Health and Safety precautions and human rights for elderly people. Those laws now apply to agism and increase penalties for age discrimination and abuse. [The Law] The author reveals his credentials and experience which qualify him to investigate and write about abuse of elderly people and public sector employees who suffer from a variety of antisocial personality disorders. The articles about psychopaths (sociopaths) published on Contra Cabal web sites predicate upon personal experience of individuals who commit elder abuse. He does not take diagnosis of antisocial personality dysfunction lightly; however, he has a duty of care to expose it so that victims can protect themselves against future abuse by applying the principle: better the devil you know . . . [About the Author] Readers should consider the articles a work-in-progress as the content forms part of ongoing complaint proceedings which can ethically only be published at the end of each stage. The site will receive regular updates which readers can access by clicking on the CDHT MenuMachine > New CDHT Articles + Updates. Accredited journalists may contact the author for access to documents relating to ongoing proceedings. [Introduction]

Preamble - The Law Society - Solicitors Regulation Authority - Antony Townsend

A series of articles will expose the behavior of SRA employees and their neglect to investigate a complaint over a two-year period. All the named people received a prepublication notice to which some of them responded. Those responses will receive a mention in the articles if they relate to facts.

	iSRA relies on a kick-the-bucketxi icatch-22 that it has createdxthenxi iawaits the Complainant’s demise.

Incidents which officials deliberately neglect to address indicate the need for an independent ombudsman to investigate age discrimination by SRA employees, then publicly report the findings. Independent mediation of fair settlements between aggrieved elderly people and officials who manipulate them by virtue of their age can help mitigate damage and discourage others from acting the same way. The present SRA bureaucracy epitomizes anarchy and dumb insolence.

Incidences of delaying process to deny justice and evade responsibility properly to investigate age discrimination have drastically increased by use of a number of evasive ploys. The most common disgrace relates to delay of process to such an extent that the wait for a decision exceeds normal life expectancy. Executives take a gamble on death to evade their responsibility in law to act expeditiously, then call it "risk management".

	The Evader

John Norton, Legal Services Ombudsman, charged with investigating incompetent or deliberately subversive actions by SRA executives, states that he cannot proceed with an appeal until SRA makes a decision. In a particular case, a decision should have taken about 30 days to make; however, Antony Townsend, SRA Chief Executive Officer and his bevy of bimbos have not properly investigated the complaint although two years have elapsed since the filing.

Cuan Gibson, Team Manager, SRA Conduct Investigation Unit made arbitrary assertions that no professional misconduct by solicitors named in a complaint ever took place without SRA investigating the complaint. He also stated that in-house solicitors do not act for trade union members (despite members paying their salaries and legal services forming part of the membership contract), another statement without substantiation. He then threatened the Journalist with an unlawful prior restraint.

Does Gibson arrogantly believe that his arbitrary decisions overrule a unanimous ruling by nine judges in Washington State Supreme Court which determined the right of the Journalist freely to publish information similar to the content Gibson would censor?

That ruling does not provide much protection when despotic administrators make illegal threats because they disagree with the content of messages: a disagreement probably based upon disclosure of their own malfeasance. They fear dissent and have an aversion to controversy. Their addiction to political correctness frequently causes them to invoke censorship. They act upon an irrational expectation that a publication may contain something that they would not wish others to read, then arbitrarily try to suppress it.

The articles will cover these issues and the research material and correspondence will form part of the Petition for Public Inquiry submitted to Kenneth Clarke QC, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice.

[Preamble] [Petition for Public Inquiry]

A source reported that David Charles Broom now lives in Trimingham, Norwich, UK
and works for the Bishop of Norwich.

The following information derives from the full text of the sequel.

Without Let or Hindrance - The Sequel

The Right Reverend Graham James, Bishop of Norwich and
renegade former HM Consul David Charles Broom

European Union - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Former HM Consul David C Broom neglected to provide consular support (in violation of Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and Universal Declaration of Human Rights) by not challenging abuse of judicial process. He left the Journalist (a British national and permanent resident of the US for 45 years then approaching 70 years of age) to languish in arguably the worst prison conditions in the State of Washington for 111 days of an indeterminate contempt of court sentence based upon a catch-22 and suborned testimony.

Judge James A Doerty, Washington Superior Court held the Journalist hostage for almost four months without charges, legal representation or trial effectively as “a political prisoner”. The Journalist suffered torture and several near-death experiences during 25 days incommunicado solitary confinement among murderers and rapists which the judge claimed would “ratchet up coercion” to remove web sites located in Holland from the Internet.

Broom did absolutely nothing to meet his commitment under Vienna Conventions although repeatedly requested to act by the petitioner's friends and professional associates. Broom colluded with Doerty in maliciously placing suborned documents on international no-fly lists, allegedly an international criminal act which US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now has under investigation. DHS officers have repeatedly used the perjured documents to harass the journalist when he enters US.

By unanimous decision of nine judges (30 Mar 06), Washington Supreme Court reversed all Doerty's decisions and Seattle Municpal Court reversed malicious antiharassment orders issued by Doerty. However, the issues of criminality and violations of international law by Broom have still not been addressed by HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO).

Broom falsely represented himself in Seattle as HM Consul-General with full diplomatic immunity when in fact he only held diplomatic credentials as Consul with minimal or no immunity from prosecution.

The original article (04 Dec 07) contains the full text up to the disappearance of David Charles Broom from Seattle.

[Without Let or Hindrance] [The Sequel] [Petition for Public Inquiry]

IPCC Appeal - Jennifer Di Fabio - Grievous Bodily Harm Threat by Christopher Graham Wheal

Complainant alleges that a decision by Detective Inspector Jennifer Di Fabio, signed per procurationem by an anonymous proxy, evades responsibility by using a general denial not permitted by Professional Standards Policy. Complainant filed an IPCC complaint in a case involving alleged threats of grievous bodily harm by Christopher Graham Wheal. That complaint prompted Di Fabio to respond within two days after stonewalling a promised criminal investigation for three months.

Di Fabio has taken part in a pattern or practice of evasion in contravention of court rules which only permit general denial when the response to a complaint intends in good faith to controvert all assertions of fact. Rarely do general denials pass that test neither do reputable judges allow them. Effectively, Di Fabio has misrepresented evidence in response to a criminal referral to cover up her own neglect to investigate a threat of grievous bodily harm (GBH).

Instead of taking action to mitigate damage, Di Fabio obstructed and delayed justice then denied it contrary to law. Her delaying tactics can only interpret as political expedience given the involvement of three former Labour ministers, arguably accessories after the fact to international crimes, who form an integral part of the issues upon which the threatened GBH and complaint to Lewisham police premised.
[Full Text - IPCC Appeal] [nota bene - Superintendent Lisa Crook]

Readers can interpret the documents that substantiate statements made in this article for themselves by reading the portfolio filed with Independent Police Complaints Commission. [IPCC Portfolio]

Petition for Public Inquiry to Kenneth Clarke QC, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

The first duty of any government is to protect its citizens and by extension the first duty of a trade union is to protect its members. Justice relies upon principles and procedures founded in law and precedent; otherwise, a state of anarchy exists which has no place in a democracy.

Prior to an NUJ National Executive Council (NEC) meeting (26 Oct 01), NUJ duty of care for Petitioner complied with NUJ rules and regulations also international human rights conventions. However, as soon as Jeremy Dear, a rabid Marxist and alleged psychopath, took office as General Secretary (01 Feb 02), the negotiations fell apart and have remained that way for nine years.

Instead of complying with Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary and Claire Susan Kirby, NUJ In-house Solicitor implemented laissez faire policies. Primarily an economic doctrine, laissez faire opposes government regulation or interference so that administrators can operate according to their own rules in violation of law. Laissez faire has effectively granted NUJ officials and officers impunity.

Procrastination by judges in an ex parte consort allowed Seattle mafia and others outside the ambit anonymously to commit perjury, subornation, and racism on a grand scale. Other NUJ members have challenged that neglect in a plethora of law suits not connected with Petitioner. That litigation has established a pattern or practice of malicious criminal intent, ostensibly to cover up crimes and racism, identical to, and in parallel with, Petitioner’s NUJ experience.

NUJ prior restraint and a BBC media blackout has lasted for more than nine years. Dear ordered a prior restraint on all NUJ publications then colluded with British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) to apply an illegal prior restraint that has lasted for more than nine years. Press Complaints Commission (PCC) conspired with Dear to prevent the processing of complaints against Mark Thompson, Director-General, BBC and NUJ.

The cost of legal research, documentation, preparation and refutation made necessary by false representation and neglect to disclose information by Peter Murray, NUJ President (which classifies as an abuse of his position under Fraud Act 2006) amounts to £2,500.00. The total cost to date for defending barratry by Dear and Michelle Stanistreet, Deputy General Secretary in a consort with FoC Barry Fitzpatrick, NUJ Officials Chapel and Roy Martin Mincoff, NUJ In-house Solicitor now exceeds £85,000.00. [Kill the Messenger] [Barratry] [NUJ/NEC Panel Portfolio]

Referrals to several UK, Scotland and Ireland police divisions presently await investigation of: Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary; Michelle Stanistreet, NUJ Deputy General Secretary; Paul Holleran, NUJ Scottish Organiser; Peter Murray, President, NUJ National Executive Council; and Séamus Dooley, Secretary, NUJ Ireland; for criminal activity. Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) now has Kirby and Mincoff under investigation for multiple complaints of gross professional misconduct now expanded to include recent involvement by Mincoff in international arbitrage. They have exacerbated the situation by preempting criminal proceedings and organizing a string of sycophants to convene an unlawful National Executive Council panel hearing in absentia which committed unlawful jurisdictional arbitrage in violation of NUJ rules and UK laws.
[Public Inquiry - Kenneth Clarke QC] [The Law Society - SRA Preamble]

NUJ officials filed new false and malicious criminal allegations against the member according to Metropolitan Police Camden and Lewisham officers. Those allegations have exposed the member to risk of arrest, imprisonment pending trial, and possible wrongful conviction and sentence. By that, NUJ attempted to preempt or to evade police investigation of the criminal referrals already recorded against them, thereby perverting the course of justice.
[The Plod Thickens]

Christopher Graham Wheal, an NUJ officer followed-up the false and malicious criminal complaints by Mincoff with a threat of grievous bodily harm against Petitioner allegedly to try to stop him pursuing his civil and human rights. Metropolitan (Lewisham) police presently have an investigation in progress to establish probable cause for referral of that incident to Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) as do two other police divisions investigating complaints of actual bodily harm against the Petitioner and an attempted abduction. [Full Text]

	Christopher Graham Wheal, NUJ Officer and NUJ-Left Thug and Hit Man
	Will you piss off with your inane ramblings. My nephew was killed in a tragic accident on Tuesday and all I get is wank from you. Now take me off your email list, or better still, fuck off and die you complete and utter tosser*. One more peep from you and if I bring harassment charges you'll be lucky. I find you personally I'll fucking break your legs. [sic]		The author has reported to Metropolitan Police (Lewisham) that Wheal committed a criminal offense by threatening grievous bodily harm against an NUJ member in violation of Protection from Harassment Act 1997. [Chris Wheal]
	This reprobate describes himself as a journalist and writing instructor. *tosser. A derogatory term for a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous person.	The author neither had any previous contact with Wheal nor did he write about him. Wheal received a media release but did not opt-out from the list.

Perverting the Course of Justice - Kangaroo Courts

Jeremy Dear, General Secretary, National Union of Journalists (NUJ) et alia, and successive rogue In-house Solicitors Claire Susan Kirby (Thompsons Solicitors, Cardiff) and Roy Martin Mincoff repeatedly conspired with others to pervert the course of justice through railroading, anarchistic arbitrage and use of kangaroo courts, thereby establishing malicious intent.

	Murray

Peter Murray, President, NUJ National Executive Council has now tried to intimidate a witness by arbitrarily expelling him from NUJ membership. He cited NUJ Rule 24 Disciplinary Proceedings, a rule not in evidence, as his authority. Murray ignored the fact that five police divisions and other law enforcement agencies have NUJ officials and officers under investigation for alleged criminal activity which makes the issues effectively sub judice pending action by Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and a court ruling.

Murray has joined Dear and Mincoff in a conspiracy to commit serious criminal offences in UK and Irish jurisdictions. A common law offence, perverting the course of justice carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. It can include any of three acts: fabricating or disposing of evidence; intimidating or threatening a witness or juror; and intimidating or threatening a judge. [Kangaroo Courts]

Anarchistic Arbitrage and Abuse of Process to support an unlawful Stitch-up

Washington State Supreme Court findings prohibited censorship, prior restraint, and Internet denial-of-service attacks upon printed and electronic publications. However, NUJ officials and officers continue to: bring malicious claims of violation of NUJ rules; interfere with the rights of journalists; file false and misleading criminal charges and commit Internet denial-of-service attacks. Prior restraint and media blackouts continue and form part of several complaints to Press Complaints Commission. [Press Complaints Commission]

	Fray

	Dooley

Despite referral of evidence to several UK police divisions for investigation, NUJ has exacerbated the situation by trying to preempt criminal proceedings. Jeremy Dear, General Secretary; Michelle Stanistreet, Deputy General Secretary; Paul Holleran, NUJ Scottish Organiser; Barry Fitzpatrick, Head of Publishing and FoC Officials Chapel also Séamus Dooley, Secretary, NUJ Ireland and John Fray, former Deputy General Secretary have convened a National Executive Council hearing and recruited a string of sycophants to use jurisdictional arbitrage which violates NUJ rules and UK laws. By that, they have again abused process by ignoring that the issues effectively became sub judice after police referral. The police investigations must now involve investigation by Independent Police Complaints Commission (UK) and Police Complaints Commission Scotland due to dereliction by, and alleged collusion among, NUJ officials and UK police officers.
[Law Enforcement Railroading] [The Plod Thickens] [Abuse of Process]

Fitzpatrick brought false and misleading charges now under investigation by law enforcement agencies. Dooley and Fray have used jurisdictional arbitrage in an attempt to frustrate those investigations by convening an NUJ hearing to preempt both civil and criminal proceedings. By that, they have violated international law. The participants in that NUJ hearing could classify as accessories after the fact in a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
[A Patent Stitch-up] [Abuse of Process] [Position Paper]

A Decade of Washington State and UK/EU Anarchy

National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) formed a non-profit corporation then built and later refurbished Council House (CH), Seattle, Washington. The corporation rents independent-living apartments to senior citizens. The building does not classify as a nursing home and may not legally house vulnerable adults. [Council House]

A faith-based organization, NCJW Seattle satisfies its own values to the detriment of its tenants. It knowingly employs bigoted non-Jewish staff members who racially discriminate against non-Zionist tenants. As straw men, those staff members obtain charitable grants and government funds then the directors launder them to support illegal Zionist agendas in Israel: a ploy that distances the directors from unlawful acts committed in their behalf.
[Straw-Man Stratagem]

Tenants who live at Council House legally possess all their faculties and have the ability to act independently. They rent apartments in a block governed by landlord/tenant laws. The difference between those tenants and other landlord/tenant relationships lies only in economic disadvantage and age eligibility not physical or mental disability.

The directors employed Stephen A Mitchell, a ravening sociopath and out-of-work actor as director and administrator. He holds responsibility for three homicides by abuse and the attempted murder of a vulnerable adult. Mitchell allowed Islamic terrorist sympathizers to download bomb-making and other terrorist literature on Council House computers. [Tall Structure Terror]
[Ravening Sociopath] [Thespian Liar] [Homicide by Abuse] [Vulnerable Adults]

Council House attorney Richard R Beresford with attorney/directors Donald G Cohan and Bradley K Spear, granted Mitchell impunity and have since covered up his crimes by bribing witnesses to move out-of-state. CH continues to employ Mitchell (confined to his office and relieved of all administrative duties) to negotiate charitable grants. No homicide has occurred at CH since his confinement although he has never been charged for alleged multiple homicide, perjury, and subornation that he committed. [Conspiracy 2001] [Conspiracy 2002]

The journalist reported the incidents to CH directors, US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Seattle Office of Civil Rights who did nothing about the abuse; instead, they terrorized the journalist. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) acknowledged the report but evidently took no action on the complaint. Knowing of submission of the complaints to government authorities, CH retaliated by sending the journalist to jail with solitary confinement and denied him legal representation or a trial. On appeal, nine Washington State supreme court judges unanimously ruled in the journalist’s favor. [Washington Supreme Court]

CH Directors, WSBA, UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and International Federation of Journalists (including National Union of Journalists UK) have neither addressed professional misconduct and dereliction by their members nor made reparations to the journalist despite the supreme court decision. [CH Directors] [Perjurers]

Convening a public inquiry and a hearing before the European Court of Human Rights into the issues reported on this web site have become essential for the public good. The public and organisations must have an opportunity to make written submissions and listen to oral evidence. The conclusions of an inquiry in the form of a written report remain essential to democracy. An independent hearing will make recommendations to improve the quality of government or management of public organisations in the future. It is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. [Public Inquiry]

Fraudulent Denial of NUJ Member Services

Judge James A Doerty, Washington Superior Court (Seattle) claimed that interviews by journalists with willing sources defined as harassment and that news gathering constituted illegal surveillance and stalking then jailed Paul Trummel, a long-standing National Union of Journalists member (then approaching seventy years of age) without trial or legal counsel in violation of international law. [Kafkaesque Experiences]

The London-born journalist could not comply with an ambiguous and illegal catch-22: a court order with impossible consequences which allowed Doerty to place a prior restraint on free speech. Doerty ordered removal of EU hosted web sites that exposed homicide, terrorism, and elder abuse. [Censored Articles]

With full knowledge of the imminent jailing, Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary and Claire S Kirby (then NUJ in-house solicitor) neglected to act under Human Rights Act 1998, Vienna Convention, and European human and civil rights laws by delaying and denying solidarity. They later refused services guaranteed by NUJ Rules and Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. By providing extensive support and legal representation to at least six other members (and nonmembers) in similar cases during the same period, they committed a series of discriminatory acts. [Solidarity] [Solidarity Statements]

David C Broom, British Consul (Seattle) colluded with Doerty to ratchet up coercion which allowed Doerty to transfer the Journalist to incommunicado solitary confinement among murderers and rapists. The Journalist languished in jail for 111 days of an indeterminate sentence and experienced several near-death experiences before release on a writ similar to habeas corpus. [Metamorphosis] [Doerty Poster]

Timothy R Gopsill, Editor, Journalist (NUJ magazine) orchestrated a seven-year, media blackout to cover up the neglect by Dear and Kirby which prevented NUJ members from knowing about the case and providing their support. Gopsill also invoked an illegal prior restraint with British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and Press Gazette. Baroness Buscombe, Chairman and Tim Toulmin, Director, Press Complaints Commission (PCC) stonewalled complaints filed against NUJ, BBC, and Press Gazette. Those complaints alleged collusion and illegal prior restraint for political expedience.
[NUJ Position Paper] [NUJ/PCC Complaint] [BBC/PCC Complaint] [The Fifth Estate]

Five international media and civil rights amicus curiae argued the case in Washington Supreme Court. In a unanimous finding by nine judges, supreme court reversed all Doerty’s decisions which absolved the Journalist of wrongdoing. [Washington Supreme Court]

	A Collusive, Coercive, Disingenuous Quintet Justice Delayed means Justice Denied
						Public Inquiry Convening a public inquiry into the issues reported on this web site has become essential to the public good. [Public Inquiry]
	Straw	Ricketts	Sheinwald	Miliband	Thomas
	David Miliband MP, Former Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Sir Peter Ricketts, Permanent Under-Secretary and Head of the Diplomatic Service; Sir Nigel Sheinwald, British Ambassador to the United States; Jack Straw MP, former Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor; and Gareth Thomas MP, Former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for International Development colluded in a cover-up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office dereliction with Jeremy Dear, General Secretary, National Union of Journalists. [Without Let or Hindrance] [Quid Pro Quo] [John Pilger - New Statesman] [The Journalist]

Dear and Roy Martin Mincoff (present NUJ in-house solicitor), while feigning solidarity, colluded in a cover up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dereliction by negotiating a £262,000.00 quid pro quo in a distinct conflict of interest with Gareth R Thomas MP (Harrow West), former Minister of State, Department for International Development (the Journalist’s MP) and Jack Straw MP, former Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor. [Quid Pro Quo] [John Pilger - New Statesman] [The Journalist]

Dear and Mincoff aided and abetted Ronald A Johnson (an Internet terrorist) by deliberately not providing promised NUJ assistance to obtain a court restraining order against Internet denial-of-service attacks. Informed of the attacks on a daily basis, NUJ deliberately allowed the vandalism to continue. Since January 2008, systems and equipment repair exceeded £0.5 million which does not include inestimable collateral publishing damage. Metropolitan Police investigated the attacks used for electronic prior restraint and FBI received frequent reports.
[Cyber-Terrorists]

Six Internet denial-of-service (DoS) attacks occurred (24-30 Oct 09) since publication of an article by Dominic Ponsford, Editor, Press Gazette commenting on election content disseminated by Mark Watts. Ponsford generated heated argument by NUJ officials, officers, and members. Some of those comments linked to NUJ Club JournoScam web site. [Press Gazette]

Sources have determined that NUJ officials negotiated with a hacker to effect this prior restraint. Damage that followed publication of the Press Gazette article cost £5,500.00 which does not take into account publishing losses which continue to accrue. The hacker repeated the web vandalism at 24-hour intervals which cost £1,000.00 each time to repair. Total damage now amounts to £10,500.00.

The hacker ratcheted up coercion by specifically deleting pages and reference data from NUJ Club JournoScam that dealt with the election of the Journalist editor. That vandalism necessitated reprogramming. Metropolitan Police, Computer Fraud Unit and Federal Bureau of Investigation have received details.
[Election Fraud] [Election Comments] [Election Cyber-Terrorism]

The Law Society, Legal Complaints Service (LCS) found probable cause that Kirby and Mincoff committed professional misconduct and initiated action by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Meanwhile, Mincoff abused LCS resolution processes by providing false and misleading information. [Mincoffs Flying Circus]

David Cockburn, Certification Office for Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations delayed investigation and adjudication of two complaints against National Union of Journalists (NUJ) for five months through illegal stonewalling. By that, he effectively granted NUJ officers and officials impunity to extend an eight-year pattern of illegal activity for another year. [Certification Officer]

NUJ has effectively bankrupted its member through barratry, dereliction, and denial of member services.

Duty of Care to NUJ Members

If Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary; Michelle Stanistreet, Deputy General Secretary and other officials and officers of National Union of Journalists rendered the support and legal services that members pay them to provide, then this web site would not exist. Instead, they denied due process to members and involved themselves in political splinter groups, primarily NUJ-Left. They have run external political campaigns to support extremist groups to the detriment of member services in violation of NUJ rules and laws governing trade unions. By that, they have repeatedly violated their duty of care to NUJ members.

NUJ officials and staff must maintain a high-level duty of care which means that they must not commit any act that could harm members. If they do not satisfactorily meet that standard, then they have a legal obligation to consider those adversely affected by acts or omissions and to make reparation. That obligation forms part of the fiduciary duty owed by all trade union officials and their staff to members. The standard that they maintain must reach at least the level of responsibility that a sensible person upholds. They must also exercise reasonable care to protect member interests from harm by others.

The term “duty of care” has fiduciary significance and wide legal interpretation for trade unions. In particular, it describes an obligation imposed by law (tort in UK or delict in Scotland) which applies to NUJ officials and staff. Those laws require conduct and consideration which insures that members do not suffer from wrongdoing or unjust actions. Officials must not by law violate member rights through willful blindness or negligence.

Referrals to police in several jurisdictions allege criminal activity under: Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; Solicitors' Code of Conduct 2007; Solicitors Act 1974; Administration of Justice Act 1985; Courts and Legal Services Act 1990; Fraud Act 2006; Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006; Vienna Convention on Consular Relations; and, Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Those investigations involve an alleged pattern or practice of illegal or criminal activity by: National Union of Journalists (NUJ) officials, lawyers, and staff; National Executive Council (NEC) officers; also, London Freelance Branch and Glasgow Branch officers. Strathclyde Police assigned an Inspector to conduct initial investigations into the allegations contained in an incident referral (15 Jun 10). Metropolitan Police confirmed assignment of a Detective Chief Inspector to investigate the most recent incident referral (25 Jun 10). Both referrals cite NUJ officials and staff for alleged crimes. [A Patent Stitch-up]

	Glasgow belongs to me! [Click] Evasion of Duty of Care during Investigation of Criminal Incidents Justice Delayed means Justice Denied
	Clout	Wilson	Cobb	House	O'Donnell	Pollock
	Public Inquiry The arrogance and insolence of police officers shows a lack of responsibility and respect for members of the public who pay their salaries and to whom they have a duty of care. Convening a public inquiry into the issues reported on this web site has become essential to the public good. [Public Inquiry] Reasonable people must ask: Do Metropolitan (Camden) and Strathclyde police officers need a corpse before they investigate NUJ threats of grievous bodily harm and process police incident reports of aggravated assault? [Aggravated Assault] Metropolitan (Camden) and Strathclyde police divisions (MC&S) have delayed and denied justice by neglecting to respond to criminal referrals with diligent investigation. They have used stonewalling and Orwellian tactics to evade their duty of care and denied full investigation of criminal incidents with frivolous and vexatious responses. [Strathclyde Police - Railroading] Officers at the highest level have responded with arrogance and dumb insolence. They have begged questions and avoided issues using assumptions and general denial when the law requires manifest conclusions. Metropolitan Police (Camden): Dominic Clout, Chief Superintendent, Borough Commander; Neil Wilson, Detective Superintendent and David Cobb, Detective Chief Inspector. Strathclyde Police: Stephen House, Chief Constable; Anthony O'Donnell, Chief Inspector, Glasgow Central and West Division and John Pollock, Chief Superintendent, Professional Standards Department. [Without Let or Hindrance]

Important!

Adverse comments, all verified and validated to insure accurate reporting, meet legal requirements.

Hover and Click Club JournoScam menu at the head of each page for published articles also new articles and updates. Download free Mozilla Firefox browser and Adobe Acrobat reader from View menus. Readers should consider all articles as work in progress.